Products
Orbinova Solutions Ltd — United Kingdom
Aerospace — test & certification

Certifiable test records are a project after the test,not a by-product of it.

Sector
Space & aerospace systems
Standards
AS9100 — DO 178C
Assets
Engine + component test cells
Status
Problem brief
Aerospace — test & certification
01Context

Engine and component test cells run qualification and acceptance campaigns for flight hardware. Every fire is commanded against a written test card — a stepped sequence of valve states, throttle points and hold durations — under AS9100 quality governance, with software-in-the-loop elements under DO 178C.

A single hot-fire produces dense telemetry: chamber pressure at kilohertz rates, propellant tank pressures and temperatures, valve position feedback, structural strain, thrust. All of it has to be reconciled against the card, the SOPs, and the calibration state of every sensor on the stand.

02The problem

After the fire, the work starts. Engineers pull DAQ exports into spreadsheets and scripts, line up channels against the test card by hand, and chase anomalies through raw plots: was the main valve 40 milliseconds late against the commanded step? Was the pressure-rise rate inside the predicted band? Every conclusion has to trace back to a raw channel — and to the calibration certificate of the sensor behind it.

Certification needs two things at once: a tamper-proof record of what was commanded, measured and concluded, by whom and when; and fast turnaround, because the analysis backlog is what gates the next fire. Existing tools deliver one or the other. The audit pack gets assembled weeks later, by hand, from the DAQ archive, the test card, the engineer's notebook and a folder of calibration PDFs.

The fire took eight seconds. The audit-ready record took three weeks.
03How Vertex-edge should help
  1. 01Build a digital twin of each test cell that ingests every channel in lock-step with the run — pressures, temperatures, valve feedback, strain — bound to the test card step that was active when each sample was taken.
  2. 02Run the reasoning engine across telemetry and the written documents together — test card, SOPs, predicted performance bands — so anomalies are flagged against the plan, not just against static thresholds: "MV-2 opened 38 ms after the commanded step; chamber pressure rise rate 4% above the predicted band for throttle point 3."
  3. 03Bind every artefact into one cryptographically signed chain: raw streams, model version, twin state, sensor calibration certificates, engineer annotations, conclusions. Nothing in the record can be altered without the chain showing it.
  4. 04Generate the AS9100 and DO 178C aligned report pack as a by-product of the run — channel summaries, anomaly dispositions, traceability tables — ready for engineering review the same day, not assembled three weeks later.
04What success should look like

Success would mean the audit pack exists when the engines cool — and the next fire is gated by engineering judgement,not data wrangling.

Same day, by-product of the run
Audit pack
Traceable to channel + cal cert
Every conclusion
Flagged against the test card
Anomalies
Cryptographic, tamper-evident
Record integrity

This is a problem brief, not a customer case study. It describes how Vertex-edge is designed to work on this problem — not a deployment that has already happened.