Products
Orbinova Solutions Ltd — United Kingdom
Surface finishing — ISO 9001

Defects are made now,found three days too late.

Sector
Electroplating + powder coat
Standard
ISO 9001
Assets
Rack & barrel lines, rectifiers
Status
Problem brief
Surface finishing — ISO 9001
01Context

A typical ISO 9001 finishing house runs rack and barrel electroplating lines — zinc-nickel, hard chrome, electroless nickel — alongside a powder-coat line, for automotive and general industrial customers.

The deposit is governed by a tight envelope: bath chemistry (metal concentration, brightener and carrier levels), current density at the rectifier, bath temperature, agitation, line speed and pretreatment quality. Drift inside the envelope is normal; drift across its edge produces a finish that fails inspection.

02The problem

The killers are slow and invisible. Brighteners deplete with ampere-hours, but most shops only see that through a Hull-cell test run once per shift. A heater controller drifting two or three degrees pushes a bath out of its window overnight. An anode bag starts passivating and current density quietly redistributes across the rack. None of this is on a dashboard — the line keeps running on the same setpoints.

The verdict arrives downstream and late: dull or burned deposits at visual inspection, thickness out of tolerance on the XRF bench, adhesion failures after powder cure, salt-spray failures days after the parts were plated. By then an entire batch — sometimes a full weekend of shifts — has been finished against the same drifting bath. The losses land as rework, stripping and re-plating, expedited shipping, and the occasional customer escalation. The instrumentation can confirm the part is bad; it cannot say which variable moved, when, or by how much.

The bath drifted on Friday night. The salt-spray failure arrived on Wednesday.
03How Vertex-edge should help
  1. 01Connect to the line PLCs over OPC UA: rectifier voltage and current per station, bath temperature loops, dosing-pump run-times, hoist positions and dwell times. No new wiring on the tanks — the signals already exist.
  2. 02Track ampere-hours per bath against dosing history, so brightener and carrier consumption is modelled continuously instead of sampled once a shift at the Hull cell.
  3. 03Add computer vision at the exit of the final rinse-dry station, reading gloss and colour deltas on every rack — a continuous proxy for deposit quality, not a patrol inspection.
  4. 04Build a digital twin of each bath that holds the operating envelope and predicts deposit quality from the upstream variables: chemistry state, current density, temperature, dwell.
  5. 05Run in shadow for the first weeks — predicting, not acting — until its calls match what the line chemist finds.
  6. 06Move to advisory: "Brightener in tank 4 is 0.4 L below model — dose now. Evidence: 1,840 Ah since last addition, gloss delta trending down on the last 11 racks." Then, with the operator's sign-off, approval-gated dosing and rectifier corrections inside chemist-set limits — every change signed and logged.
04What success should look like

Success would mean the drift named at the tank — which variable,how far, since when — while the batch is still in the shop.

At the tank, not at salt-spray
Catch point
Variable, magnitude, onset time
Drift diagnosis
Modelled per Ah, not per shift
Bath chemistry
Signed
Every dose & setpoint

This is a problem brief, not a customer case study. It describes how Vertex-edge is designed to work on this problem — not a deployment that has already happened.